Image Agreement

The number of segments showing reversible defects in the pooled study population is shown below:

Reversable Defects

Using the 17-segment model, the number of segments showing a reversible perfusion defect was calculated for the initial Adenoscan® (adenosine injection) study and for the second study obtained using Lexiscan or Adenoscan.1,2

The agreement rate for the image obtained with Lexiscan or Adenoscan relative to the initial Adenoscan image was calculated by determining how frequently the patients assigned to each initial Adenoscan category (0-1, 2-4, or 5-17 reversible segments) were placed in the same category after the randomized scan. The agreement rates for Lexiscan and Adenoscan were calculated as the average of the agreement rates across the 3 categories determined by the initial scan.

ADVANCE studies 1 and 2 each demonstrated that Lexiscan is comparable to Adenoscan in assessing the extent of reversible perfusion abnormalities1:

Agreement Rates
All patients underwent initial baseline Adenoscan imaging and then were randomized to a second imaging procedure with either Lexiscan (0.4 mg) or Adenoscan (140 mcg/kg/min). Using the 17-segment model, average agreement rates were determined between the baseline and randomized scans by 3 independent, blinded readers. Data were studied from 2 randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies of 2015 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were indicated for pharmacologic stress MPI. Of those patients, 1871 had images considered valid for the primary efficacy study (Lexiscan: n=1240; Adenoscan: n=631].1

REFERENCES
1. Lexiscan (regadenoson) injection [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
2. Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:645-658.

To schedule an inservice demonstration, click here or call 1.800.803.6478.