Journal Articles

The following publications contain information about the Lexiscan phase 3 clinical studies as well as data from the clinical development of Lexiscan.

ADVANCE MPI (Phase 3) Studies

Cerqueira MD, Nguyen P, Staehr P, Underwood SR, Iskandrian AE. Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging: integrated ADVANCE-MPI Trial results. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:307-316.

Objectives:

  • To compare the effects of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes mellitus (DM) on the safety and efficacy of regadenoson stress MPI
  • To assess the noninferiority of regadenoson to adenosine for the detection of reversible myocardial perfusion defects

Methods:

  • Combined data from 2 identical double-blind, randomized, active-comparator, double-dummy, multicenter phase 3 trials (2015 patients, 109 centers)
  • All patients had an adenosine study then were randomized to either regadenoson or adenosine in a 2:1 ratio
  • Trial protocols limited the number of patients with "no to minimal" reversible defects, based on site investigator’s interpretation of the initial adenosine study, to ≤50% of the total randomized to guarantee assessment reflected the full range of disease severity
  • Three expert blinded readers independently scored the images using a 17-segment model
  • Reported symptoms were collected and rated as mild, moderate, or severe
  • Based on predefined analysis, symptoms were combined into 7 groups (adverse reactions according to Adenoscan label) with a frequency greater than 10%

Results:

  • Primary endpoint—noninferiority:
    • Average agreement rates between adenosine-adenosine and adenosine-regadenoson were 0.62±0.03 and 0.63±0.02, respectively
    • Within age, gender, BMI, and DM subgroups, average adenosine and regadenoson agreement rates were similar, and adenosine and regadenoson agreement rates were also similar for each initial study ischemia size category
  • Secondary endpoints:
    • Average agreement rates for adenosine-adenosine and adenosine-regadenoson were 0.76±0.03 and 0.77±0.02 for the presence and 0.77±0.02 and 0.78±0.02 for the absence of ischemia
    • For both stress agents, simple agreement rates were also similar across age, sex, BMI, and DM subgroups
    • Image quality: the majority of images were rated good or excellent (92%)

Conclusions:

  • Regadenoson is as efficacious as adenosine in detecting ischemia regardless of age, gender, BMI, and DM
  • Regadenoson can be safely administered as a fixed-unit bolus

 

Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:645-658.

Objectives:

  • To demonstrate noninferiority of regadenoson compared with adenosine by showing that the difference in the strength of agreement in detecting reversible defects, based on blinded reading, between sequential adenosine-regadenoson and adenosine-adenosine images, lay above a prespecified noninferiority margin (primary endpoint)
  • To prospectively perform safety and tolerability comparisons

Methods:

  • A multicenter, double-blind phase 3 trial of 784 patients was conducted
  • Each patient underwent 2 sets of SPECT MPI studies—an initial study with adenosine and a subsequent randomized study with either regadenoson (2/3 of patients) or adenosine

Results:

  • The average agreement rate based on the median of 3 independent, blinded readers was 0.63±0.03 for regadenoson-adenosine and 0.64±0.04 for adenosine-adenosine
  • Side-by-side interpretation of regadenoson and adenosine images was comparable for detecting reversible defects
  • A summed symptom score of flushing, chest pain, and dyspnea was less with regadenoson than with adenosine (P=.013)

Conclusions:

  • Regadenoson provides diagnostic information comparable to standard adenosine infusion
  • No serious drug-related side effects occurred
  • Regadenoson was better tolerated than adenosine

To schedule an inservice demonstration, click here or call 1.800.803.6478.